Takaisin Tulosta

Näköhermonpää ja glaukooma

Lisätietoa aiheesta
Anja Tuulonen
2.7.2014
Taulukko 1. Eri tutkimusten vertailua.
Viite Tutkimustyyppi Lukumäärä Sensitiviteetti Spesifisiteetti
Tielch ym. «Tielsch JM, Katz J, Singh K ym. A population-based...»2 Väestötutkimus 5 308 63 %, CD 0,35 63 %, CD 0,35
48 %, CD 0,5 89 %, CD 0,5
18 %, CD 0.7 98 %, CD 0,7
Harper ym. «Harper R, Reeves B. The sensitivity and specificit...»4 Sairaala-aineisto 212 64 % (53–77), CD 0,6 96 % (91–98), CD 0,6
Jonas ym. «Jonas JB, Bergua A, Schmitz-Valckenberg P ym. Rank...»3 Sairaala-aineisto 1 472 19–67 % 80–95 %

Kirjallisuutta

  1. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GO. Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29:1151-8 «PMID: 3417404»PubMed
  2. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Singh K ym. A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Am J Epidemiol 1991;134:1102-10 «PMID: 1746520»PubMed
  3. Jonas JB, Bergua A, Schmitz-Valckenberg P ym. Ranking of optic disc variables for detection of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1764-73 «PMID: 10845597»PubMed
  4. Harper R, Reeves B. The sensitivity and specificity of direct ophthalmoscopic optic disc assessment in screening for glaucoma: a multivariate analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:949-55 «PMID: 11196356»PubMed
  5. O'Connor DJ, Zeyen T, Caprioli J. Comparisons of methods to detect glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Ophthalmology 1993;100:1498-503 «PMID: 8414410»PubMed
  6. Caprioli J. Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:153-9 «PMID: 1730536»PubMed
  7. Jonas JB, Gründler AE. Correlation between mean visual field loss and morphometric optic disk variables in the open-angle glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;124:488-97 «PMID: 9323939»PubMed