Takaisin

Atomoksetiinin haittavaikutukset lapsilla ja nuorilla

Näytönastekatsaukset
Arja Voutilainen
21.6.2016

Näytön aste: A

Atomoksetiinin haittavaikutukset lyhytkestoisessa hoidossa lapsilla ja nuorilla ovat tavallisia mutta yleensä lieviä.

In a recent meta-analysis «Schwartz S, Correll CU. Efficacy and safety of ato...»1, efficacy and safety of atomoxetine (ATX) compared with placebo in the treatment of children and adolescents. Study inclusion criteria were as follows: ATX monotherapy versus placebo; double blinded randomized controlled design; primary ADHD of any type, with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), anxiety, and depression comorbidities allowed; patient age < 18 years; patient IQ of > 75. The primary outcome measure was baseline to end-point change in parent-rated, 18-item ADHD efficacy scale (ADHD-RS IV P/I), Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham rating scale-revised-IV ADHD (SNAP-RS IV ADHD), ADHD-RS Japanese version, investigator-administered (ADHD-RS J/I Total) or Parent/Investigator ADHD checklist score. Data from the safety outcomes were also extracted.

Altogether 25 RCTs, with 3 928 participants were included in the analysis. The mean follow-up time was 8.6 weeks (range: 4 – 18 weeks). The average ATX dose was 1,17 mg/kg/day. Mean age was 10,3 years, with 68,2% being <13 years old. Altogether, 51,3% were anti-ADHD medication naïve, and 44,6% had comorbid ODD/CD.

All-cause discontinuation with ATX was similar to that of placebo. However, ATX had higher discontinuation rate due to adverse effects (AEs) (RR = 1,89; CI 95% = 1,08 – 3,31; p=0,03). At least 1 AE (70,4% versus 56,1%; p<0,01) and at least 1 psychiatric AE (21,5% versus 7,4; p<0,01) were more frequent with ATX. The most common AEs associated with ATX were gastrointestinal symptoms, including vomiting, abdominal pain, nausea and diarrhea (22,1% versus 12,4%; p<0,0001), nervous system symptoms, including dizziness, headache, somnolence, sedation and drowsiness (21,8% versus 15,2%; p<0,0001), anorexia (19,2% versus 5,2%; p<0,0001) and fatigue (11,7% versus 4,6%; p<0,0001). Serious AEs (1,5% versus 1,0%, NS), aggression (7,5% versus 6,0%; NS), depression (2,9% versus 6,0%, NS), insomnia (7,1% versus 6,8%; NS) and suicidal ideation (1,3% versus 0,9%; NS) were not different from placebo.

Compared to placebo, patients with ATX treatment had an increase in diastolic BP (2,5 mmHg; CI 95% 1,8 to 3,1; p<0,0001), systolic BP (1,5 mmHg; CI 95% 0,6 to ,3; p<0,001), and heart rate (6 beats per minute; CI 95% 5 to 7; p<0,0001). They also had decreased body weight (-1,4 kg; CI 95% -1,1 to -1,8; p<0,0001) and shorter QTc on ECG (-12,8 ms; CI 95% -9,0 to -16,2; p<0,0001).

  • Study quality: Moderate
  • Applicability: Good for short term treatment of children and adolescents in Finland
  • Comment: The quality of evidence from this meta-analysis is downgraded, because no assessment of included studies were reported. However, it is not suggested to cause bias to the results regarding side-effects.

Kirjallisuutta

  1. Schwartz S, Correll CU. Efficacy and safety of atomoxetine in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results from a comprehensive meta-analysis and metaregression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2014;53:174-87 «PMID: 24472252»PubMed